ToF-SIMS evaluation of PEG-related mass peaks and applications in PEG detection in cosmetic products | Scientific Reports

Blog

HomeHome / Blog / ToF-SIMS evaluation of PEG-related mass peaks and applications in PEG detection in cosmetic products | Scientific Reports

Nov 13, 2024

ToF-SIMS evaluation of PEG-related mass peaks and applications in PEG detection in cosmetic products | Scientific Reports

Scientific Reports volume 14, Article number: 14980 (2024) Cite this article 1251 Accesses 42 Altmetric Metrics details Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) are used in industrial, medical, health care, and

Scientific Reports volume 14, Article number: 14980 (2024) Cite this article

1251 Accesses

42 Altmetric

Metrics details

Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) are used in industrial, medical, health care, and personal care applications. The cycling and disposal of synthetic polymers like PEGs pose significant environmental concerns. Detecting and monitoring PEGs in the real world calls for immediate attention. This study unveils the efficacy of time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) as a reliable approach for precise analysis and identification of reference PEGs and PEGs used in cosmetic products. By comparing SIMS spectra, we show remarkable sensitivity in pinpointing distinctive ion peaks inherent to various PEG compounds. Moreover, the employment of principal component analysis effectively discriminates compositions among different samples. Notably, the application of SIMS two-dimensional image analysis visually portrays the spatial distribution of various PEGs as reference materials. The same is observed in authentic cosmetic products. The application of ToF-SIMS underscores its potential in distinguishing PEGs within intricate environmental context. ToF-SIMS provides an effective solution to studying emerging environmental challenges, offering straightforward sample preparation and superior detection of synthetic organics in mass spectral analysis. These features show that SIMS can serve as a promising alternative for evaluation and assessment of PEGs in terms of the source, emission, and transport of anthropogenic organics.

Polyethylene glycols (PEGs), also known as macrogols, are a versatile family of linear polymers that comprised of repeated oxyethylene (–CH2–CH2–O–) subunits1,2. The molecular formulae are HO(CH2CH2O)n, where n denotes the average number of oxyethylene subunits. This average value is typically greater than or equal to four, signifying the presence of multiple subunits within the polymer chain. Each PEG is followed by a number, e.g., PEG 200, which refers to the average molecular weight of polymer. PEGs encompass a broad range of molecular weights, spanning from 200 to 40,000,000 g/mol. The physical states of PEGs are influenced by their molecular weight of polymers. For instance, PEGs with molecular weights ranging from 200 to 600 g/mol are typically in a liquid state at room temperature. Conversely, PEGs of molecular weights exceeding 1000 g/mol exist as solids, exhibiting a wax-like, paraffin appearance, or as dry powders1. These materials exhibit a high solubility in water as well as in a diverse array of organic solvents, including alcohols, esters, ketones, aromatic solvents, and chlorinated solvents3,4. This exceptional solubility profile makes PEGs suitable for various applications across multiple fields5,6,7.

At present, PEGs are widespread and used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, food, personal care products, and industrial processes8. Their solubility characteristics, biocompatibility, non-toxic, and ability to act as dispersing agents, emulsifiers, and stabilizers make them ideal for drug delivery systems, skin creams, and numerous other applications5,9,10. PEGs also play a crucial role in the synthesis of nanoparticles, polymerization reactions, and as cryoprotectants11. Every year, millions of tons of PEGs are manufactured worldwide and most of them reach conventional sewage disposal systems after industrial utilization12. As a result, PEGs are commonly found in industrial and domestic wastewaters, from which they can easily migrate to the aquatic environment13. PEG 550 were found in the range of 0.5–68 mg/L in river water and seawater14. As PEG and its derivatives are expected to increase their presence in urban and industrial wastewater15, concerns have been raised about the fate of these polymers once dispersed in the environment. What’s more, PEGs can be used in tanniniferous forage. As a result, PEG–tannin complex can be detected from the animal feces, demonstrating that the PEG–tannin complex can end up in soil and raise an environment concern16,17.

The biological degradation of PEGs is slow, and they stay a long time in the natural environment. This may raise potential subsequent interactions in the human body18. Therefore, studies on PEGs are extremely important to understand the distribution, transformation, and removal of these pollutants from the natural environment. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) including reversed-phase LC–MS, normal or reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, matrix-assisted laser-desorption (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) MS, gas–liquid-chromatographic (GLC), and direct injection electrospray-selected ion monitoring mass spectrometry have been used to identify and quantify PEGs in previous studies19,20,21,22,23. However, these methods need complex pretreatment procedure to extract or transfer PEGs as derivatives before analysis. Therefore, analysis approaches that offer easy sample preparation and accurate detection are attractive to the community of PEGs research and assess the impacts on the environment, air, water, and human health.

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) is a powerful tool in applied surface analysis. It provides detailed elemental, molecular, and isotopic mass spectra, and two-dimensional/three-dimensional (2D/3D) mapping of solid surfaces, thin films, or gas–solid interfaces24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. Although ToF-SIMS has been used often in biological applications and the semiconductor industry in past decades, its applications are not limited to these well-known fields. A few papers reported that ToF-SIMS was applied for PEG analysis, such as PEG 600, PEG 800, PEG 1000 and PEG 100,000, and a series of characteristic peaks, such as [PEGx + H]+ and [PEGx + Na]+ were identified35,36,37,38,39. However, only limited PEGs are analyzed and the analysis of real-world samples is absent40. ToF-SIMS provides simple and fast sample preparation compared to laborious liquid extraction, for example. It can be used to analyze and identify organics with the limits of detection (LODs) at equivalent of parts per trillion (ppt) level in real environmental samples41. ToF-SIMS can produce mass spectra of intact oligomer ions, allowing the calculation of average molecular weights from the moments of the ion peak intensity distribution36,37. ToF-SIMS mass spectra provide not only average molecular weight data from intact oligomers but also significant chemical structure information from the various fragments. As a static SIMS analysis technique, ToF-SIMS is semi-quantitative; however, it can provide relative concentrations if the secondary fragments are correctly selected42. In addition, as an imaging mass spectrometry technique, it has high mass accuracy and high mass resolving power. Cheminformatics approaches are long established in analytical chemistry (e.g., NMR, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS), high resolution mass spectrometry, and MS–MS) to determine unknowns in complex mixtures from known chemical information, where observations indicative of chemical structural information are used43,44,45,46. Similarly, ToF-SIMS spectral results can be used to identify unknowns from known peak information based on observations of signatures of functional groups or characteristic fragments of PEGs. In this work, we demonstrate that ToF-SIMS is a powerful tool for rapid analysis and identification of PEGs. We show that ToF-SIMS can detect and differentiate PEGs with different average molecular weights. These new results enrich the investigation of PEGs. Moreover, we challenged ToF-SIMS in the analysis of real-world cosmetic products. Our results based on spectral analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and 2D image comparisons show that ToF-SIMS is valid for studying PEGs. Overall, ToF-SIMS can provide more insights and offer an alternative solution to the study of the potential risks associated with PEGs in the natural environment including water, air, or soil.

Previous studies have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of ToF-SIMS in providing high mass accuracy and reliable spectra reproducibility24,27,28,47,48,49. The LODs of organics have been reported at ppt level in real field collected environmental samples41. In this study, seven samples were analyzed (Table S1) and PEG 300 was selected as a representative example to show the reproducibility of static ToF-SIMS spectra. Similar results were obtained for all samples analyzed in this work. The comparison of ToF-SIMS spectra of PEG 300 is presented in Figs. S1a–1c and Figs. S2a–c in the positive ion mode in the m/z+ range of 0 to 800 in normalized and absolute intensities, respectively. The spectra labeled as P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, and P6 correspond to six sequential measurements of the sample on a silicon (Si) wafer in the positive ion mode. Notably, the ToF-SIMS spectral comparison of PEG 300 demonstrates consistent and reproducible data, where characteristic peaks reappear in all six positive spectra with similar intensities. Also, the spectral comparison in the negative ion mode (Figs. S3–S4) yield similar observations to those in the positive mode.

To quantitatively assess the reproducibility of the SIMS spectra, we performed a statistical analysis of relative mass accuracy of the peak area and peak height using PEG 300 as an example with multiple measurements. It is worth noting that more replicates could increase the estimate of average and standard deviation (S.D.) values based on replication statistics50. We generally acquired six to seven data points for each sample in static ToF-SIMS spectral analysis. The benefits to improve repeatability become insignificant after four or five replicates in measurements51. When the data points show good measurement precision, we used three replicate measurements to calculate S.D. and average of peaks of each sample for simplicity41,52. The characteristic peaks selected for the measurement repeatability evaluation in the positive and negative ion mode were summarized in Tables 1 and S2, respectively. The summary of peak area and peak height ratios of representative peaks in the positive mode is listed in Table S3. The results show that peak area and peak height ratios of key peaks have good measurement precision. The ratios of peak areas and peak heights of key peaks are listed in Table S4. These ratios were calculated using the counts of the specific peak divided by total counts of all selected key products and fragments.

The relative standard deviations percentage (RSD%) of peak area ranges from 0.90 to 6.47%, with an average of 3.40%. As to peak area ratios, the RSDs% range from 0.00 to 9.09% with an average of 2.32%. It has been reported if the RSD% is 5% in peak areas, the method would be considered suitable for quantitative analysis53. Our results show that most RSD% values of the peak area fall below 5%, underscoring the robust reproducibility of the static SIMS spectral measurements. When considering the peak height, the RSD% ranges between 0.81 and 12.13% with an average of 4.24%, slightly larger than the peak area calculation. Similar results are obtained for the peak height ratios. Overall, our results indicate that the SIMS spectral measurements have excellent reproducibility in the analysis of pure PEG and HEG reference samples.

Similarly, good SIMS spectral reproducibility is obtained in the negative ion mode (Figs. S3a–c and Figs. S4a–c). The RSDs% of peak area range from 0.24 to 8.23% with an average value of 3.61% (Table S5). The RSD% peak area ratios are between 1.11 and 5.86% with an average of 3.11% (Table S6). Our result shows that most RSDs% of the peak area fall below 5% (Table S5), indicating excellent spectral reproducibility in the negative ion mode. Additionally, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the peaks selected for the evaluation of measurement repeatability are all much bigger than three, indicating that the peaks are signal not noise (Tables S7–S8). More information and detailed statistical analysis results are provided in the supporting information.

Tables 1 and S2 summarize the identified peaks in the positive mode. Figure 1 depicts ToF-SIMS spectral comparison of HEG, PEG 200, PEG 300, PEG 400, PEG 4000, Clinique, Purity, and Si substrate control in the positive ion mode, in the m/z+ range of 200 to 800. Figure S5 shows comparison of m/z+ 0–200, while additional negative spectral compassions are depicted in Figs. S6a–c. ToF-SIMS is often regarded as a semi-quantitative technique54. In order to compare the relative abundance of peaks in the series of PEG and HEG reference samples, normalized intensities are used. Also, the spectral comparisons in absolute counts are shown in Figs. S7–S8. The absolute spectral comparisons show that the counts of the peaks discussed in this study are reasonable, and SNR are generally several tens of thousands.

ToF-SIMS spectral comparison of HEG, PEGs, Clinique, and Purity: (a) m/z+ 200–500 and (b) m/z+ 500–800. Normalized intensity (Norm. Int.) is calculated using total ion intensities. The red, blue, and green color represent different series of PEG peaks, namely red stands for HO(CH2CH2O)nH2+, blue HO(CH2CH2O)nHNa+, and green fragment peaks.

A series of PEG characteristic peaks (Table 1) are observed with good intensities and the counts of those peaks are in the range of a few hundreds to several hundreds of thousands for the following peaks, such as m/z+ 63.045 C2H7O2+, 107.075 C4H11O3+, 151.098 C6H15O4+, 195.123 C8H19O5+, 239.148 C10H23O6+, 283.176 C12H27O7+, 327.201 C14H31O8+, 371.227 C16H35O9+, 415.252 C18H39O10+, 459.279 C20H43O11+, 503.307 C22H47O12+, 547.300 C24H51O13+, 591.354 C26H55O14+, 635.399 C28H59O15+, and 679.417 C30H63O16+. These peaks show a regular mass increase, and they can be expressed by the general formula, i.e., HO(CH2CH2O)nH2+, where n ranges from 1 to 15 (Figs. 1 and S5, labeled in red color). These peaks are formed when the PEG molecules HO(CH2CH2O)nH get a H atom. The observation of the series peaks indicates that ToF-SIMS can capture the characteristic peak patterns in PEG samples. Among these identified characteristic peaks, m/z+ 63.045 C2H7O2+ is observed with a high relative intensity in HEG and Purity samples, but lower intensities in Clinique and other PEG samples (Fig. S5). The peak m/z+ 503.307 C22H47O12+ is observed with high intensities in PEG 300 and PEG 400 samples; and the peak m/z+ 679.417 C30H63O16+ is observed with high intensities only in the PEG 400 sample (Fig. 1b). The above observations provide the evidence that ToF-SIMS can identify differences in peak intensities among the samples. Additionally, the PEG characteristic peak can be detected in real-world cosmetic products (i.e., Clinique and Purity samples) using ToF-SIMS. The PEGs fragment m/z+ 31.019 CH3O+ identified in Clinique and Purity also supports the latter finding (Fig. S5). The peaks m/z+ 327.201 C14H31O8+, 371.227 C16H35O9+, 415.252 C18H39O10+, 459.279 C20H43O11+, 547.300 C24H51O13+, 591.354 C26H55O14+ and 635.399 C28H59O15+ are observed with high intensities in PEG 300 and PEG 400 samples (Fig. 1a,b), indicating that PEG 300 and 400 samples share some similar properties to certain extent. In addition, the peaks m/z+ 151.098 C6H15O4+, 195.123 C8H19O5+, 239.148 C10H23O6+, and 283.176 C12H27O7+ are observed with low intensities in HEG and PEG samples (Figs. S5 and 1a). This observation suggests that the HEG share some common peaks with PEGs. Furthermore, the peak m/z+ 195.123 C8H19O5+ is observed in Clinique and Purity samples, providing additional support for the identification of PEG characteristic peaks in real-world cosmetic products using ToF-SIMS.

Another series of PEG characteristic peaks, which can be expressed as HO(CH2CH2O)nHNa+ with n ranging from 2 to 15, is observed in the samples with varying intensities (Figs. 1 and S5, labeled in bule color). It is well known that Na+ can be easily added on polymer fragment ions to enhance ionization yield in positive ion ToF-SIMS spectra35. Among these peaks, m/z+ 129.059 C4H10O3Na+ is observed not only in HEG and PEG samples but also in Clinique and Purity samples (Fig. S5). This observation proves that ToF-SIMS can detect PEGs in real-world cosmetic products. The peaks m/z+ 261.128 C10H22O6Na+ and 305.151 C12H26O7Na+ are observed with low intensities in HEG and all PEG samples (Fig. 1a). The peaks m/z+ 349.181 C14H30O8Na+ is observed with relatively high intensities in PEG 300 and PEG 400 samples but lower intensities in HEG and PEG 4000 samples (Fig. 1a). The two observations suggest HEG and PEGs not only share some common properties but also exhibit significant differences. ToF-SIMS can detect both the common and distinct characteristic peaks. For example, the peaks m/z+ 393.206 C16H34O9Na+, 437.237 C18H38O10Na+, and 481.263 C20H42O11Na+ exhibit higher intensities in PEG 200, PEG 300, and PEG 400 samples compared to HEG and PEG 4000 samples (Fig. 1a), indicating the chemical composition of PEG 200, PEG 300 and PEG 400 are similar.

Additionally, PEG 4000 shares some common peaks with PEG 200, PEG 300, and PEG 400, exhibiting high intensities. These peaks are identified as m/z+ 525.293 C22H46O12Na+, 569.281 C24H50O13Na+, and 613.352 C26H54O14Na+ (Fig. 1b). The peak m/z+ 569.281 C24H50O13Na+ is also observed in Clinique, further indicating that ToF-SIMS can detect PEG peaks in the real-world cosmetic products. Peaks, such as m/z+ 657.370 C28H58O15Na+ and 701.392 C30H62O16Na+, are observed with highest intensities in PEG 40,000, but lower intensities in PEG 200, PEG 300, and PEG 400 samples (Fig. 1b). These two observations confirm that the series of PEG samples not only share common peaks but also bear significant differences. All the observations collectively support the conclusion that ToF-SIMS is a powerful tool for capturing characteristic peak patterns and identifying differences among PEG samples.

Apart from the two series of PEG characteristic peaks, several fragment peaks of PEGs are identified in samples using static ToF-SIMS. The peaks include but not limit to m/z+ 31.019 CH3O+, 45.035 C2H5O+, 53.001 C3HO+, 81.074 C6H9+, 89.064 C4H9O2+, 133.094 C6H13O3+, 175.103 C8H15O4+ and 221.150 C14H21O2+ (Figs. S5 and 1a, labeled with green color). Among these peaks, m/z+ 31.019 CH3O+is observed with high intensities in HEG and all PEG samples, but lower intensities in Purity and Clinique samples. The peak m/z+ 53.001 C3HO+ is observed with relative high intensities not only in HEG and PEG 200 samples but also in Purity. In addition, peak m/z+ 133.094 C6H13O3+ is observed with high intensities in Clinique and PEG 300, PEG 400, and PEG 4000. However, the peak m/z+ 81.074 C6H9+ is observed with high intensities only in HEG and Purity. These observations provide solid evidence that ToF-SIMS detects PEGs in real-world cosmetic products.

The ToF-SIMS spectral comparison of the seven samples and the Si substrate control in the negative ion mode show similar results to those in the positive ion mode (Figs. S6a–c and S9a–c). The consistent spectral observations in both positive and negative ion modes imply that ToF-SIMS can capture characteristic peak patterns of PEG samples and effectively identify differences among various PEG samples. Moreover, our results emphasize the significance of ToF-SIMS as a viable and reliable approach for studying PEGs present in real-world cosmetic products. Its ability to detect and differentiate PEGs in complex mixtures, such as cosmetic formulations like Clinique and Purity, further underscores ToF-SIMS’ potential as an essential analytical tool for investigating and assessing the presence of PEGs in various real-world applications in environment.

PCA, a widely used multivariate analysis technique, was employed to discern differences among the samples in ToF-SIMS analysis24,27,28,33. The scores plots and loadings plots are typically presented together to analyze the variances within the samples. Scores plots depict the similarity and dissimilarity among samples, while loadings plots provide insights into the contributions of the components corresponding to the principal components' (PC) scores. In this study, selected peak spectral PCA was conducted to validate the spectral observation and to identify additional features among the series of samples and their components.

Figure 2 displays PC1 versus (vs.) PC2, PC2 vs. PC4, and their loadings plots in the positive mode. Figure S10 shows PC2 vs. PC3 and PC3 loading plots. PC1, PC2, PC3 and PC4 can explain more than 90% of all data. Specifically, PC1 explains 41.6% of data and primarily separates PEG 200, PEG 300, and PEG 400 from HEG, Purity, and Clinique. PC2 explains 25.1% of data and separates HEG and PEG 200 from PEG 300, PEG 400, PEG 4000, Purity, and Clinique. PC3 explains 13.6% of data and separates PEG 200, PEG 300, and Clinique from HEG, PEG 400, PEG 400 and Clinique. PC4 explains 10.5% of data and separates PEG 200, PEG 200, and Purity from HEG, PEG 400, and Clinique. In PC1 positive mode loadings (Fig. 2c), PEGs including PEG 200, PEG 300, PEG 400, and PEG 4000 are the main contributors, indicating that the series of PEG samples share significant similarities in their components. It’s not surprising to observe similar signatures in PEG samples, considering that they all possess the same chemical formula of HO(CH2CH2O)nH. The characteristic peaks, such as m/z+ 89.064 C4H9O2+, 133.094 C6H13O3+, 175.103 C8H15O4+, 327.201 C14H31O8+, 349.181 C14H30O8Na+, 371.227 C16H35O9+, 393.206 C16H34O9Na+, 415.252 C18H39O10+, 437.237 C18H38O10Na+, 459.279 C20H43O11+, 481.263 C20H42O11Na+, 503.307 C22H47O12+, 525.293 C22H46O12Na+, 547.300 C24H51O13+, 569.281 C24H50O13Na+, 591.354 C26H55O14+, 613.352 C26H54O14Na+, 635.399 C28H59O15+, 657.370 C28H58O15Na+, 679.417 C30H63O16+, and 701.392 C30H62O16Na+, make great contributions to the variance (Fig. 2c, labeled in red color). PC1 negative separates HEG, Purity, and Clinique from the series of PEG samples (Fig. 2a). This finding suggests that the composition of the three samples is largely different from the series of PEG samples. In PC1 negative mode loadings, fewer organic fragments (Fig. 2c, labeled with dark blue color), such as m/z+ 63.045 CH3O+, 81.074 C6H9+, and 165.119 (not identified), display high loadings, showing that these peaks contribute more significantly in HEG, Purity, and Clinique.

ToF-SIMS spectral PCA results of HEG, PEGs, Clinique, and Purity in the positive mode: Scores plots of PC1 vs. PC2 (a), PC2 vs. PC4 (b), PC1 (c), PC2 (d), and PC4 (e) loadings plots in m/z+ 50–800. Peaks are labelled in their center masses. The red and dark blue (or light blue) colors are used to mark contributing peaks in the positive and negative PC loadings, respectively. The green color represents peaks that could not be unidentified.

The PC2 negative scores in Fig. 2a reveals that PEG 300, PEG 400, PEG 4000, Purity, and Clinique share the same peaks. This finding provides further confirmation that characteristic PEG peaks are indeed detected in real-world cosmetic products. In PC2 negative loadings, peaks such as m/z+ 133.094 C6H13O3+ and 221.150 C15H25O+ (Fig. 2d, labeled in dark blue color) contribute significantly more to the variance compared to peaks such as m/z+ 415.252 C18H39O10+, 459.279 C20H43O11+, 503.307 C22H47O12+, 547.300 C24H51O13+, 591.354 C26H55O14+ (labeled in light blue), and several unidentified peaks, including m/z+ 148.077 and 265.170 (Fig. 2d, labeled in green color). The PC2 positive scores demonstrate that HEG shares common peaks with PEG 200 (Fig. 2a). This observation is reasonable because HEG and PEG 200 both contain the chemical compound C12H26O7, which can form similar fragments when analyzed by ToF-SIMS. The peaks, including but not limited to m/z+ 53.001 C3HO+, 63.045 C2H7O2+, 81.074 C6H9+, 393.206 C16H34O9Na+, and 437.237 C18H38O10Na+, play a more significant role in distinguishing HEG and PEG 200 from the other samples (Fig. 2d, labeled in red color). The PC3 positive scores in Fig. S10a reveals that PEG 200, PEG 300, and Clinique share same peaks. The peaks, such as 221.150 C14H21O2+, 393.206 C16H34O9Na+, 437.237 C18H38O10Na+, and 481.263 C20H42O11Na+ are observed with high loadings in PC3 positive loadings (Fig. S10b). PC3 negative scores separate Purity from Clinique, showing the compositional differences between the two samples. Figure 2b depicts PC2 vs. PC4 scores plot. It is evident that Purity exhibits some components that are also found in PEG 200 and PEG 300, providing further support for the detection of PEG-related peaks in real-world cosmetic products. The peaks, such as m/z+ 63.045 C2H7O2+, 165.119 (not identified), 393.206 C16H34O9Na+, 437.237 C18H38O10Na+, and 481.263 C20H42O11Na+ are representative components in PC4 positive loadings (Fig. 2e, labeled in red color). The PC4 negative scores plot reveals that Clinique shares common peaks with PEG 400, PEG 4000, and HEG. This observation agrees with the previous result, indicating the detection of PEG characteristic peaks in cosmetic products. Furthermore, PC4 negative scores separate Clinique from Purity, suggesting significant compositional differences between these two cosmetic products.

Overall, the SIMS spectral PCA results obtained from the scores and loadings plots provide valuable insights into the shared characteristics and distinctive features among the analyzed samples. The observations support the presence of PEG characteristic peaks in cosmetic products and highlight compositional differences between different product categories. The scores plots of PC1 vs. PC2, PC2 vs. PC4, and their corresponding loadings plots in the negative mode can be found in Fig. S11. These negative mode results agree with the findings from the positive mode plots. Further details and comprehensive information are available in the supporting information.

Figures 3 and S12 illustrate the SIMS 2D image comparison of selected key peaks observed in HEG, PEGs, and real-world cosmetic products in the positive ion mode. The color scale ranging from red to dark signifies higher and lower relative ion intensities, respectively. The absolute counts of these peaks are reasonable, and the SNR of these peaks are in the range of 36 to 2360 (Table S7), suggesting the peaks are reliable signals. The same applies to other samples studied in this work. This means that the peaks discussed herein are based on reasonable measurements. Additional normalized 2D images are seen in the supporting information (Figs. S13–S14).

ToF-SIMS 2D image comparison of key peaks in the positive mode: (a) HEG sample, (b) PEG 200 sample, (c) PEG 300 sample, (d) PEG 400 sample, (e) PEG 4000 sample, (f) Purity sample, and (g) Clinique sample.

The 2D image comparison results support the spectral observations in the positive mode. First, it confirms that HEG and PEGs share certain common component peaks, albeit with varying intensities, highlighting the similarities and differences among the samples. For instance, peaks such as m/z+ 129.059 C4H10O3Na+ and 217.106 C8H18O5Na+ are observed with low intensities in all PEG and HEG samples (Fig. 3). On the other hand, peaks like m/z+ 371.227 C16H35O9+ and 415.252 C18H39O10+ are detected with higher intensities in PEG 300 and PEG 400 compared to the other samples (Fig. S12). Notably, the prominent peaks m/z+ 657.370 C28H58O15Na+ and 701.392 C30H62O16Na+ are more abundant in PEG 4000 compared to other PEGs (Fig. S12). Secondly, the presence of PEG fragments in real-world cosmetic products is clearly detected using ToF-SIMS. For instance, peaks like m/z+ 53.001 C3HO+, 107.075 C4H11O3+, 129.059 C4H10O3Na+, and 217.106 C8H18O5Na+ are detected in Purity and Clinique samples (Fig. 3). However, peaks like m/z+ 53.001 C3HO+ and 107.075 C4H11O3+ are observed with high intensities in both Purity and Clinique, while the peak m/z+ 53.001 C3HO+ is detected with higher intensity in Purity compared to Clinique, and the peaks m/z+ 107.075 C4H11O3+ and 129.059 C4H10O3Na+ exhibit higher intensity in Clinique. The distribution of PEGs in complex real-world cosmetic formulations like Purity and Clinique implies that ToF-SIMS has the potential ability to effectively analyze PEGs within samples collected from natural environments.

Additionally, normalized, and absolute 2D image comparisons of selected key peaks in the negative ion mode (Figs. S15–S16) yield similar observations and support the findings obtained in the positive mode. Further details can be found in the supporting information.

We demonstrate that ToF-SIMS is a powerful tool to analyze PEGs with simple sample preparation. Our results show good mass spectral repeatability in static SIMS measurements in both positive and negative ion mode. Most values of the RSD% of peak area fall below 5%, showing an excellent reproducibility of the SIMS spectral measurements of reference PEGs and HEG. The key peaks and fragments can be identified with relative mass accuracy of less than 65 ppm. The SNRs of representative peak fragments range from several hundreds to tens of thousands, indicating that characteristic peaks of PEGs could be analyzed using ToF-SIMS effectively. The static SIMS spectral comparison results highlight the robustness of ToF-SIMS in capturing characteristic peak patterns and distinguishing variations among samples containing PEGs. The spectral PCA results further confirm the findings in spectral analysis; and multivariate analysis effectively discriminates compositions among different samples. Moreover, we demonstrate that ToF-SIMS can detect PEGs in commercial cosmetic products. Such results provide valuable proof that SIMS is a viable method for studying PEGs in environment. This analytical approach could have a significant impact on quality control, safety assessment, and regulatory compliance in industries dealing with PEG-containing products. Overall, results presented in this SIMS study are attractive for complex organic detection due to its simplicity in sample preparation and efficiency for sample analysis. More standard chemicals and reference samples containing PEG and target products are warranted for analysis in ToF-SIMS to establish a rich reference library of data for its application in environmental organics like PEGs and other complex and challenging pollutant analysis in the future.

A series of samples were prepared in this study, including one 2-(Hexyloxy)ethanol (HEG, C8H18O2), four PEGs, and two real-world cosmetic products. The samples description was summarized in Table S1. The chemicals HEG, PEG 200, PEG 300, and PEG 400 used in this work were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), and PEG 4000 was acquired from Alfa Aesar (A Johnson Matthey Company). The real-world cosmetic products Purity (one-step facial cleanser, Philosophy, USA) and Clinique (dramatically different moisturizing gel, Clinique, USA) were purchased from Macy’s (a department store in USA). All materials were used as is without further purification.

Prior to sample preparation, Si wafers underwent a sequential cleaning process involving acetone, isopropanol, and high-purity DI water for a duration of 3 min each24,28. After thorough cleaning using solvents, a UV-O3 plasma treatment (Model No. 342, Jelight Company Inc., USA) was performed for 2 min. to remove remaining organic contaminants on the surface of the Si wafer. Sample preparation was carried out within a fume hood (Hamilton Laboratory Solution LLC., WI, USA).

The schematic of PEG sample preparation and analysis in static ToF-SIMS are illustrated in Fig. 4. Among these chemicals, HEG, PEG 200, PEG 300, PEG 400, Purity, and Clinique exist in a liquid state at room temperature. As to these liquid chemicals, the samples for SIMS analysis were prepared by the following steps: (1) the clean Si wafer (10 × 10 mm2 diced, Ted Pella Inc., CA, USA) was put in a new petri dish; (2) then 10 μL of liquid sample was deposited on the cleaned Si wafer using a pipette; (3) another clean Si wafer was used to repeatedly scrape the surface with the droplet until it spread as a thin layer. This is because the PEG or HEG droplet was difficult to dry at its natural state even using nitrogen blowing. On the other hand, PEG 4000 exists in a solid state at room temperature, the sample was prepared by diluting 1.0 g of solid powder in 50 mL DI water (18.2 MΩ) dispensed from a Barnstead water purification system (Nanopure diamond model) to obtain a 20 mg/mL solution. The PEG 4000 sample was then prepared following the steps described above using the solution. The prepared samples on Si substrates were immediately analyzed in ToF-SIMS to avoid possible surface interference and contamination.

The schematic showing PEG sample preparation and analysis in static ToF-SIMS: (a) picture of the PEG 400 material; (b) dry PEG 400 film prepared on the Si wafer for ToF-SIMS analysis; (c) the ToF-SIMS back mount stage with samples loaded prior to analysis; (d) a representative SIMS mass spectrum, and (e) a 2D image of m/z+ 393.206 C16H34O9Na+ obtained from the PEG sample.

A ToF-SIMS V instrument (IONTOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) was used to analyze samples. During analysis, the pressure in the main chamber was remained at ~ 1 × 10–8 mbar, and it took about 0.5 h for the vacuum to the desirable condition in the load lock chamber. A 25 keV Bi3+ primary ion beam with ~ 450 nm in diameter and 10 kHz pulse energy was used for spectral measurements. The pulse width was 0.8 ns, and the current was set at ~ 0.6 pA. Scanning for SIMS spectra was carried out over an aera of 300 × 300 μm2, with a total of 60 scans performed on the sample surface. The ion dose was kept smaller than 1 × 1012 ion/cm2. An electron flood gun with a target current of 2.20 pA was used for surface charging compensation during measurements. To assure the precision of spectral measurements, at least 6 data points were acquired for each sample in the positive and negative ion mode, respectively.

Analysis of the ToF-SIMS data was performed using the IONTOF Surface Lab 6.3 software (https://iontof-download.com/login.php). The mass spectra were calibrated by 15.023 CH3+, 107.075 C4H11O3+, 239.148 C10H23O6+, and 349.181 C16H29O8+ in the positive mode and 14.016 CH2−, 61.032 C2H5O2−, 105.054 C4H9O3−, and 325.185 C14H29O8− in the negative mode, respectively. To evaluate the ability of the ToF-SIMS to distinguish masses with close m/z ratios. The mass deviation is defined as the difference between the observed mass and the theoretical mass divided by the theoretical mass55,56. It was checked by two common peaks CH3+ and CH2− before performing mass calibration. The calculated value was smaller than 65 ppm among key peaks in all samples, suggesting that the adjacent peaks could be distinguished effectively using the high current bunched mode. The mass calibrated data were exported to Origin Pro (2019b, https://www.originlab.com/) for plotting.

Additionally, spectral PCA was conducted using the Matlab software (R2021a) to investigate differences among PEG and HEG samples. The peaks of m/z < 50 and known PDMS interference peaks were excluded. Prior to performing PCA, the SIMS data were treated by normalization to the total ion intensities of selected peaks, square-root transformation, and mean centering57. ToF-SIMS 2D images47,48,49 were reconstructed using Surface Lab 6.3 software and data were exported to Igor Pro to plot the spatial distribution of various PEGs and real-world cosmetic products. Figure 5 depicts the overall workflow of PEG analysis using ToF-SIMS as the graphic highlight.

The Table of Content (TOC) graphic depicts the detection of representative PEGs using ToF-SIMS.

The datasets generated for this study can be found in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Kolská, Z., Valha, P., Slepička, P. & Švorčík, V. Refractometric study of systems water-poly(ethylene glycol) for preparation and characterization of Au nanoparticles dispersion. Arab. J. Chem. 12, 5019–5027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.11.006 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zulauf, M. & Rosenbusch, J. P. Micelle clusters of octylhydroxyoligo(oxyethylenes). J. Phys. Chem. 87, 856–862. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100228a032 (2002).

Article Google Scholar

Aucouturier, C., Roux-Desgranges, G. & Roux, A. H. Excess molar volumes and excess molar heat capacities of (polyethylene glycols + water) at temperatures between T = 278 K and T = 328 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 31, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcht.1998.0458 (1999).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Mansour, F. R., Zhou, L. & Danielson, N. D. Applications of poly(ethylene)glycol (PEG) in separation science. Chromatographia 78, 1427–1442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-015-2983-y (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Nagasaki, Y. Construction of a densely poly(ethylene glycol)-chain-tethered surface and its performance. Polym. J. 43, 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2011.93 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rego, A. C. B., de Melo, J. F., Neto, A. O. W. & Fonseca, J. L. C. Coil interpenetration, segment aggregation and adsorption of PEG at water/air interface. J. Surfactants Deterg. 20, 977–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-017-1959-3 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kianpour, E. & Azizian, S. Polyethylene glycol as a green solvent for effective extractive desulfurization of liquid fuel at ambient conditions. Fuel 137, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.096 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Pietrelli, L. Effect of MW and pH on poly(ethylene glycol) adsorption onto carbon. Adsorption 19, 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-013-9503-x (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shi, D. et al. To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: Immunological properties of nanomedicine’s most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 180, 114079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.114079 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hoang Thi, T. T. et al. The importance of poly(ethylene glycol) alternatives for overcoming PEG immunogenicity in drug delivery and bioconjugation. Polymers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020298 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, J., Chen, R., Wang, C., Zhao, Y. & Chu, F. Synthesis and characterization of polyethylene glycol-phenol-formaldehyde based polyurethane composite. Sci. Rep. 9, 19545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56147-x (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-L. et al. Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation of polyethylene glycols using sludge microbes. Process Biochem. 40, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2003.12.004 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Camós Noguer, A., Olsen, S. M., Hvilsted, S. & Kiil, S. Long-term stability of PEG-based antifouling surfaces in seawater. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 13, 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-016-9801-9 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jonkers, N. & de Voogt, P. in Aerobic Biodegradation of Surfactants, & Wilson’s Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry (ed T.P. Knepper, Barceló, D. & de Voogt, P.) 719–747 (WilsonXL. Elsevier, 2003).

Eriksson, E., Auffarth, K., Eilersen, A. M., Henze, M. & Ledin, A. Household chemicals and personal care products as sources for xenobiotic organic compounds in grey wastewater. Water SA 29, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i2.4848 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Abdalla, A. L. et al. Biodegradation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in three tropical soils using radio labelled PEG. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 122, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.006 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Landau, S. Polyethylene glycol, used to alleviate the negative effects of dietary tannins, can also serve as a marker of fecal output in goats. Small Rumin. Res. 48, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00293-6 (2003).

Article Google Scholar

Mackul’ak, T. et al. Treatment of industrial wastewater with high content of polyethylene glycols by Fenton-like reaction system (Fe0/H2O2/H2SO4). Desalin. Water Treat. 51, 4489–4496. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.769704 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ashiru, D. A., Karu, K., Zloh, M., Patel, R. & Basit, A. W. Relative quantification of polyethylene glycol 400 excreted in the urine of male and female volunteers by direct injection electrospray-selected ion monitoring mass spectrometry. Int. J. Pharm. 414, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.04.061 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Barman, B. N., Champion, D. H. & Sjoberg, S. L. Identification and quantification of polyethylene glycol types in polyethylene glycol methyl ether and polyethylene glycol vinyl ether. J. Chromatogr. A. 1216, 6816–6823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.024 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Mohapatra, A., Uthaman, S. & Park, I.-K. in Polymeric Nanoparticles as a Promising Tool for Anti-cancer Therapeutics (eds Kesharwani, P., Paknikar, K. M. & Gajbhiye, V.) 205–231 (Academic Press, 2019).

Sun, C., Baird, M. & Simpson, J. Determination of poly(ethylene glycol)s by both normal-phase and reversed-phase modes of high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 800, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(97)01150-3 (1998).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Warrack, B. M., Redding, B. P., Chen, G. & Bolgar, M. S. Determination of the molecular weight of poly(ethylene glycol) in biological samples by reversed-phase LC–MS with in-source fragmentation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 4283–4287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6795-3 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fu, Y. et al. Does interfacial photochemistry play a role in the photolysis of pyruvic acid in water?. Atmos. Environ. 191, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.061 (2018).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Huang, D. et al. Secondary ion mass spectrometry: The application in the analysis of atmospheric particulate matter. Anal. Chim. Acta 989, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.042 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Molecular imaging reveals two distinct mixing states of PM(2.5) particles sampled in a typical beijing winter pollution case. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 6273–6283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08694 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Son, J., Shen, Y., Yao, J., Paynter, D. & Yu, X. Y. Surface evolution of synthetic bilgewater emulsion. Chemosphere 236, 124345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124345 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sui, X. et al. ToF-SIMS characterization of glyoxal surface oxidation products by hydrogen peroxide: A comparison between dry and liquid samples. Surf. Interface Anal. 50, 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.6334 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yang, C., Song, G., Son, J., Howard, L. & Yu, X. Y. Revealing the bacterial quorum-sensing effect on the biofilm formation of diatom Cylindrotheca sp. using multimodal imaging. Microorganisms 11, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071841 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Yu, X.-Y. & Wang, Z. Analytical advances to study the air–water interfacial chemistry in the atmosphere. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 36, e00182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00182 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, Y. et al. Molecular imaging of plant-microbe interactions on the Brachypodium seed surface. Analyst 146, 5855–5865. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1an00205h (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Son, J., Huang, Q., Chen, W. & Yu, X.-Y. To fix or not fix biofilms to study microbial soil aggregation. Microsc. Microanal. 27, 1148–1149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927621004335 (2021).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Shen, Y. et al. Revealing the structural evolution of green rust synthesized in ionic liquids by in situ molecular imaging. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2000452. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202000452 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shen, Y. et al. Green rust: Revealing the structural evolution of green rust synthesized in ionic liquids by in situ molecular imaging. Adv. Mate. Interfaces https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202070086 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Aoyagi, S., Mihara, I. & Kudo, M. Mixed polymer sample evaluation using gentle secondary ion mass spectrometry and multivariate curve resolution. Surf. Interface Anal. 44, 789–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.4824 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hanton, S. D. Mass spectrometry of polymers and polymer surfaces. Chem. Rev. 101, 527–569. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9901081 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hittle, L. R., Altland, D. E., Proctor, A. & Hercules, D. M. Investigation of molecular weight and terminal group effects on the time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectra of polyglycols. Anal. Chem. 66, 2302–2312. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00086a016 (1994).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Keller, B. A. & Hug, P. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry of industrial materials. Anal. Chim. Acta 393, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00017-3 (1999).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tang, C. et al. Adsorption and electrically stimulated desorption of the triblock copolymer poly(propylene sulfide–bl-ethylene glycol) (PPS–PEG) from indium tin oxide (ITO) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 600, 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2006.02.004 (2006).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Keller, B. A. in Polymer Surface Characterization (ed Sabbatini, L.) 39–72 (De Gruyter, 2014).

Yu, X.-Y. et al. Molecular detection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Front. Chem. 11, 1253685. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1253685 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chan, C. M. & Weng, L. T. Surface characterization of polymer blends by XPS and ToF-SIMS. Materials 9, 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9080655 (2016).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rathahao-Paris, E., Alves, S., Junot, C. & Tabet, J.-C. High resolution mass spectrometry for structural identification of metabolites in metabolomics. Metabolomics https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-015-0882-8 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Huan, T. et al. MyCompoundID MS/MS search: Metabolite identification using a library of predicted fragment-ion-spectra of 383,830 possible human metabolites. Anal. Chem. 87, 10619–10626. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03126 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Markley, J. L. et al. The future of NMR-based metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 43, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.08.001 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Leggett, A. et al. Identification of unknown metabolomics mixture compounds by combining NMR, MS, and cheminformatics. Methods Enzymol. 615, 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2018.09.003 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wei, W. et al. Characterization of syntrophic Geobacter communities using ToF-SIMS. Biointerphases 12, 05G601. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4986832 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Yu, X., Chen, J., Zhu, Z. & Yu, X.-Y. Dark air–liquid interfacial chemistry of glyoxal and hydrogen peroxide. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0085-5 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, F. et al. Evolution of aqSOA from the air–liquid interfacial photochemistry of glyoxal and hydroxyl radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10236–10245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03642 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Osborne, J. W. & Overbay, A. in Best Practices in Quantitative Methods (ed Thousand Oaks) 205–213 (SAGE Publications, Inc., 2008).

Blainey, P., Krzywinski, M. & Altman, N. Points of significance: Replication. Nat. Methods 11, 879–880. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3091 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yu, J. et al. In situ molecular imaging of adsorbed protein films in water indicating hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. Sci. Rep. 10, 3695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60428-1 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Belu, A. M., Graham, D. J. & Castner, D. G. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry: Techniques and applications for the characterization of biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 24, 3635–3653. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00159-5 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gilmore, I. S. & Seah, M. P. Static SIMS: Towards unfragmented mass spectra—the G-SIMS procedure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 161, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-4332(00)00317-2 (2000).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Green, F. M., Gilmore, I. S. & Seah, M. P. TOF-SIMS: Accurate mass scale calibration. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 17, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2005.12.005 (2006).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Green, F. M., Gilmore, I. S. & Seah, M. P. Mass accuracy—TOF-SIMS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 6591–6593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.096 (2006).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Graham, D. J. & Castner, D. G. Multivariate analysis of ToF-SIMS data from multicomponent systems: The why, when, and how. Biointerphases 7, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13758-012-0049-3 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, W. et al. TOF-SIMS surface analysis of chemical components of size-fractioned urban aerosols in a typical heavy air pollution event in Beijing. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 69, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.04.005 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Peppe, S., Blanksby, S. J., Dua, S. & Bowie, J. H. Formation of two isomeric C3HO radicals from charged precursors in the gas phase. Potential interstellar molecules. J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 5817–5824. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp994229g (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ye, P., Ding, X., Ye, Q., Robinson, E. S. & Donahue, N. M. Uptake of semivolatile secondary organic aerosol formed from alpha-pinene into nonvolatile polyethylene glycol probe particles. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07435 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Selifonov, S. A. Microbial oxidation of adamantanone by Pseudomonas putida carrying the camphor catabolic plasmid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 186, 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(05)81566-9 (1992).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Experimental efforts were supported by the strategic Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) of the Physical Sciences Directorate of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (Grant No. 11167). Preparation of the manuscript was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) Environmental Management (EM) program award 277636. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U. S. DOE under contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830. This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. DOE. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

College of Biology and Oceanography, Weifang University, 5147 Dongfeng East Street, Weifang, 261061, Shandong, China

Yanjie Shen

Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA

Yanjie Shen & Xiao-Ying Yu

Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99354, USA

Jiyoung Son

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Y.S.: Data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. J.S.: Data curation, review, and editing. X.-Y.Y.: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.

Correspondence to Xiao-Ying Yu.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Shen, Y., Son, J. & Yu, XY. ToF-SIMS evaluation of PEG-related mass peaks and applications in PEG detection in cosmetic products. Sci Rep 14, 14980 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65504-4

Download citation

Received: 15 April 2024

Accepted: 20 June 2024

Published: 01 July 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65504-4

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative